Table of Contents
Nathaniel Eaton served as Harvard College’s first master from 1638 until his dismissal in September 1639, when the Massachusetts Bay General Court found him guilty of savage beatings of students and the systematic near-starvation of the men in his charge, making him the first administrator in Harvard’s history and the first to be removed from it in disgrace.
In the summer of 1639, a man named Nathaniel Briscoe went before the Massachusetts Bay authorities and described what life inside Harvard College had been like under its first master. He described the food. Thin porridge served without butter. Bread that was not fit to eat. Beer that had gone bad. He described the morning meal: a dish called “hasty pudding” prepared badly and served without any accompaniment worth mentioning. And he described what happened to a student named John Clarke when he intervened to complain: the master, Nathaniel Eaton, had fetched a walnut-tree cudgel and beaten Clarke with it for more than a hundred blows while two other men held him still. Briscoe himself had been beaten with a cudgel on a separate occasion. He had been held while Eaton struck him repeatedly. This was the man the colony of Massachusetts had appointed to run its new college. He had been in the post for just over a year.
The man appointed before the institution existed
Harvard College was not yet a functioning institution when Nathaniel Eaton arrived to run it. The vote of the Massachusetts Bay General Court in October 1636 that established a “school or college” at Newtowne, the settlement that would shortly rename itself Cambridge, had not produced a building, a staff, a curriculum, or a body of students by the time Eaton was engaged to lead it in 1638. What existed was an intention, a plot of land, and the bequest of John Harvard, a Charlestown minister who died of tuberculosis in September 1638, leaving half his estate and his library of some four hundred volumes to the new institution. The college was named for him. Whether Harvard ever met Eaton is not recorded.
Eaton was in his late twenties when he took up the post. He had been educated at Westminster School and at Christ’s College, Cambridge, where he had studied under William Ames, the Puritan divine whose work shaped the theology of the New England settlements. He had then spent time studying at Franeker in the Netherlands, another Calvinist institution with a strong reformist tradition. He came, in other words, with credentials that would have appeared excellent to the founders of a college designed to educate Puritan ministers in the New World. The Reverend Thomas Shepard of Cambridge, Massachusetts, a man whose diary and memoir are among the more searching personal documents of the early colonial period, later recalled that the colonists had been deceived in Eaton. The deceiving had not taken long to become visible.
What he did and how it was recorded
The household Eaton ran was part school, part lodging house, with his wife Elizabeth overseeing the domestic arrangements and the feeding of the students who lived in it. Elizabeth Eaton’s kitchen is one of the few elements of this story in which a woman plays a clearly documented role, and the documentation is specific. Witnesses before the General Court described meals in which the beef was undersupplied or absent, the pudding was prepared carelessly, the bread was stale, and the beer was unfit. The students were not being fed adequately. Whether this was Elizabeth Eaton’s decision or her husband’s economy is not entirely clear from the record, but the household was operating as a unit and both Eatons were held responsible.
The beatings are documented with more precision. John Clarke’s case received the most attention: Clarke had made some complaint about the food and Eaton had responded by having him held while he beat him at length with a walnut cudgel. Nathaniel Briscoe had been beaten on a separate occasion. Other students gave accounts consistent with a master who used physical punishment not as the proportionate correction that even the most rigorous Puritan pedagogues of the period considered acceptable, but as something closer to assault. Governor John Winthrop, whose journal is the most comprehensive surviving chronicle of early Massachusetts Bay, noted the case and its outcome. Winthrop was not a squeamish man and had seen considerable hardship in the colony’s early years. His account of Eaton’s dismissal reads as genuine distaste.
The General Court fined Eaton, required him to make restitution to those he had wronged, and removed him from the mastership. Elizabeth Eaton appeared separately before the court and was admonished for the condition of the students’ food. Nathaniel Eaton did not remain in Massachusetts to make the required restitution. He left for Virginia before the payments were made.
The institution he left behind
The college he vacated was in a poor state. It had barely begun. The building Eaton had been using was described as inadequate. The small body of students who had been working under him dispersed after his dismissal, and for approximately a year Harvard College had no students, no master, and no clear future. John Winthrop noted that the college was likely to come to nothing.
It did not come to nothing because in 1640 a man named Henry Dunster arrived from England and agreed to take the post. Dunster was, by most subsequent accounts, everything Eaton had not been: a careful scholar, a competent administrator, and a man who built the curriculum and the physical fabric of the institution with methodical care. He served for fourteen years. It is Dunster who is properly regarded as the first president of Harvard in the functional sense, the man who turned a bequest and a resolution of the General Court into a college that actually operated. The year 1642 saw the first commencement, with nine graduates. Whatever might have happened under Eaton did not. Under Dunster it did.
The money and books that John Harvard had left, and which had given the college its name, remained. They were the institution’s principal asset through the years of Eaton’s damage and the uncertain period that followed it. The library was destroyed in the Harvard Hall fire of 1764, but in 1638 and 1639 it was the most significant collection of books in the colonial settlements and it gave the reconstituted college something real to build around.
Eaton in Virginia, and afterwards
Nathaniel Eaton’s life after Massachusetts is documented in fragments, and the fragments suggest a man incapable of remaining out of trouble for very long. In Virginia he appears to have practised as a physician, a profession that required no formal licensing in the colonial settlements and that attracted a number of men whose other careers had not prospered. He was also reported to have kept a school of some kind. Within a few years he had returned to England.
In England he eventually took holy orders and held clerical posts. He was imprisoned for debt on more than one occasion. The records of his debts and imprisonments have more documentary substance than his brief period running Harvard, because debtors’ prisons generated paperwork and court records in ways that colonial schoolhouses did not. He died in the King’s Bench debtors’ prison, probably around 1674, having spent the final decades of his life in the moderate obscurity appropriate to a man who had managed to fail comprehensively in at least three separate professions.
The Reverend Thomas Shepard, whose testimony against Eaton before the General Court had been among the most damaging, recorded the episode in his memoir with a specific kind of Puritan retrospection: the colonists had been too trusting, they had not examined his character carefully enough, and God had used the disaster to show them their error. This is not an unreasonable summary of what had happened, if rendered in a theological vocabulary that Eaton’s subsequent creditors would not have found particularly useful.
What the episode reveals about early Harvard
The Eaton affair is occasionally treated as a footnote in Harvard’s history, an embarrassing prologue before the real institution got started. This misreads it. The affair reveals the specific conditions of institutional creation in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the late 1630s: a community that needed its college urgently, that had very limited means of verifying the character of men appointed to run it from a distance, and that was operating in a legal and administrative framework still being assembled from nothing.
John Winthrop’s General Court had to invent the appropriate response to Eaton’s conduct because nothing quite like this situation had arisen in the colony before. The fine, the requirement of restitution, the admonishment of Elizabeth Eaton, the removal from office: these were improvised responses to an institutional crisis that the colony had no precedent for handling. The fact that the outcome was reasonably decisive, and that Eaton was gone and replaced within roughly a year, reflects well on the General Court’s capacity to act, if not on its initial judgment in making the appointment.
The students Eaton beat and starved are named in the records. John Clarke, who received the worst of it, is documented. Nathaniel Briscoe, whose testimony was specific and credible, is documented. These are not figures who left marks on history beyond this episode, and the genealogy researcher looking for a Clarke or Briscoe ancestor in the Cambridge or Charlestown area in the late 1630s has a specific set of records to consult.
Genealogy research note for Nathaniel Eaton Harvard master
For researchers with ancestors connected to early Harvard or to the Cambridge and Charlestown communities of the late 1630s, the primary documentary resources are concentrated in a small number of well-preserved collections.
The Massachusetts State Archives in Boston holds the records of the General Court, including the proceedings that resulted in Eaton’s dismissal. These are among the earliest surviving civil records of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and have been partially transcribed and published in the Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England (Nathaniel Shurtleff, ed., 1853–54), which is available in full on archive.org and through the HathiTrust Digital Library.
John Winthrop’s journal, published in modern scholarly editions as The Journal of John Winthrop 1630–1649 (Harvard University Press), covers the Eaton affair and places it within the social and political context of the colony. It is one of the richest sources for identifying named individuals in early Massachusetts Bay.
The Harvard University Archives holds the earliest surviving administrative records of the college, including material relating to the period of Henry Dunster’s presidency that provides context for reconstructing the state of the institution Dunster inherited. Researchers looking for student or staff names connected to Harvard before 1650 should begin with the finding aids on the Archives website.
The Reverend Thomas Shepard’s memoir and journal have been published in scholarly editions and are valuable for reconstructing the Cambridge community of the 1630s and 1640s, with specific named individuals, families, and domestic arrangements described in unusual detail for the period.
For researchers tracing English origins of early Massachusetts Bay colonists, the New England Historic Genealogical Society holds extensive records and its Register has published many transcriptions of early colonial material relevant to the Cambridge and Charlestown communities. Eaton’s own English background connects to Westminster School and Christ’s College, Cambridge; the Cambridge University Library holds college admission records from this period, accessible through the Alumni Cantabrigienses compiled by John Venn.
The guide How to find your ancestors in historic university records covers the methodology for navigating both English university admission records and early American institutional archives in more detail.
Named individuals index for Nathaniel Eaton Harvard master
| Name | Dates | Role / connection to article |
|---|---|---|
| Nathaniel Eaton | c.1610–c.1674 | First master of Harvard College, 1638–39; dismissed by the Massachusetts Bay General Court for beating students and providing inadequate food; died in King’s Bench debtors’ prison, London |
| Elizabeth Eaton | fl. 1638–39 | Wife of Nathaniel Eaton; managed the household and kitchen at Harvard; admonished separately by the General Court for the condition of students’ food |
| John Harvard | 1607–1638 | Charlestown minister; left half his estate and approximately 400 books to the new college in 1638; the college was named in his honour |
| Katherine Rogers Harvard | fl. 1630s | Mother of John Harvard; her family background in Southwark, London, is documented in parish records |
| Henry Dunster | 1609–1659 | Succeeded Eaton as Harvard’s leader in 1640; regarded as the college’s first effective president; oversaw the first commencement in 1642 with nine graduates; dismissed in 1654 over his Baptist views on infant baptism |
| Nathaniel Briscoe | fl. 1638–39 | Harvard student or assistant; testified before the General Court about beatings and food conditions under Eaton |
| John Clarke | fl. 1638–39 | Harvard student; beaten by Eaton with a walnut-tree cudgel for complaining about food; his case received the most detailed documentation in the General Court proceedings |
| John Winthrop | 1588–1649 | Governor of Massachusetts Bay; his journal is the primary narrative source for the Eaton affair and the near-collapse of Harvard in 1639 |
| Thomas Shepard | 1605–1649 | Puritan minister of Cambridge, Massachusetts; testified against Eaton and recorded the affair in his memoir; his congregation’s location adjacent to the college made him a central witness |
| William Ames | 1576–1633 | Puritan divine at the University of Franeker, Netherlands; Eaton’s teacher; his intellectual pedigree gave Eaton his initial credibility with the Massachusetts Bay founders |
